![]() A showstopper really – I apologize for using this corporate word, it will not happen again. I soon discovered an even bigger problem. It also meant I was wasting time trying to create a clean setup for screenshots rather than just taking them and naming them. I also didn’t like having to work with selection from a black screen – you basically don’t see the desktop, rather than have it the other way around. This means you can’t memorize the interface.Īnd here, the interface has changed, with the buttons moving about, and the system tray is showing up as I invoked the program from there, and there’s no option to interact with the desktop in this mode. If some buttons do not fit on one side, they will move up and down and whatnot. I was confused, because the buttons have no hover text, plus they shift around the rectangular selection based on its size. Then, you drag to select a rectangle, and then you get a UI of symbolic buttons – the color and selection thereof having been configured earlier. here, it was an all or nothing situation. ![]() With Gnome screenshot or Spectacle, the program UI is hidden, so you get cleaner images. So screenshots were always immediate, and they always included either the menu or the system area, because I was using those to start Flameshot. ![]() The program has a rich command-line interface, but you don’t get that if you use it from the system menu. Once I realized what to do next, I began using Flameshot – and hit a bunch of fresh hurdles. Does that mean it’s running as a background service or such? no icon but the program is launched at startup. But then, what happens if you don’t use the system tray icon, does that mean you need to invoke the program from the menu every single time, and how do the last two options work together if the selection is reversed, i.e. The last tab – General – is mostly around help messages, notifications and system tray icon. Not necessarily exclusively, but as an option. I wanted something that I could use interactively and give meaningful, human-readable names like desktop-live.jpeg or distro-applications.png or similar. Now, from what I figured here, this also implies an automatic save option, which I wasn’t looking for. Plus, this is a required step, so unless you do this, you won’t be saving any screenshots, so you do need to populate the edit field. The Filename Editor tab is also a little confusing. You can also choose the quick-action buttons to be displayed, and I have to say I didn’t understand this until I actually ran the program properly the first time. On the first tab, under Interface, you can tweak how Flameshot looks like when you work it (colors and opacity), although the user has not seen the program just yet, so this feels out of context. This is not self-evident, and the whole work flow isn’t really intuitive. Why not have a simple interface like any other program?īefore you can use Flameshot, you have to review the configuration. Nothing.īut the configuration tool did launch, and only then did I realize that launching Flameshot doesn’t really open a UI, but instead you get a system tray icon that you can then use to invoke screenshot captures. I thought the program was busted, so I tried from the command line. My first snag I selected Launch Flameshot from the menu – and nothing happened. The program is available in the repos, so grab it, install it, then run it. A noble end, but does it hit the bull’s eye? This is meant to save time, and allow you to get all your needs from one piece of software. You’re supposed to capture whatever interests you, and then apply any additional tweaks to the image, like annotations, arrows and such. Thunderbolts and lightningįlameshot is a combined screenshot grabber and lightweight screenshot editor program, fused into a single tool. But is there a superior alternative? Well, according to rumors and comments, Flameshot ought to be bee’s knees. Hence, my choice at the moment is a much simpler Gnome screenshot. In theory, Plasma’s Spectacle COULD be the tool, except it forces shadows onto images, so if you want clean screenshots without massive alpha channel, you need to manually waste time cropping and cleaning. ![]() Most programs have some decent and redeeming features, but they all miss a crucial something. I complained about this in my KDE apps review article. So far, I haven’t really found a perfect match. With roughly 5,000 screenshots manually created every year, excluding the automated in-game stuff and whatnot, I am in a dire need of a program that will allow me to waste as little time on image processing as possible. The answer is, a really nice screenshot tool, so that I can do my software reviews with speed, elegance, delight, and, most of all, efficiency.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |